Torment nexus employees very concerned about future, sources say.
Post
Remote status
Replies
31> get upset when it might get used on mexicans
>have to shield house for emps against gov/corpos
>have to generate emps against gov/corpos
Can we just assemble and throw out the idiots and malicious people in the gov ? Seems like less work.
Note for cameras you can just burn their receptor with any high power lasers from ebay for 50 bucks, also enough to bling people permanently.
If they didn't fear people they wouldn't make the police/army intervene.
They just do enough to have the population release some pressure and demoralize them.
But it doesn't solve the issues that are being protested for. It just accumulates and in the end the stability of civilization will not be enough for even the law enforcement and it will go haywire like we had in the past French revolutions, which I do not want as everyone was killing each other out of any reason, be it in the name of god or something else, in the end it was just extreme levels of anger caused by problems that weren't resolved.
It should be obvious at this point that we are, globally, being farmed, and managed like farm animals. As long as we act like it, we get what we deserve.
If there's a peaceful way out of this, I'm all ears, but everything I've seen has a big fat hairy unreasonable "if" clause at the front, or some unbelievably retarded premise like, "the people will rise up... and vote them out!"
They have no problem with collateral damages, so perhaps we need to reconsider our position if we do.
[CW]
Content warning
Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Show
Hide
Content warning
Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
@mangeurdenuage
It's not dissonance. They're consistent and also quite clear. It's a very personal betrayal. They feel that the people (whom they know to be evil chuds) are the source of their personal pain, and that of those they care for.
This meme was catastrophically wrong despite it's popularity IMO. The vibe I now get from woke isn't "I'm using your morality against you" but more "can you be held to any standard of morality at all? since you clearly don't care about our safety and structures".
I'm not at all saying they're correct about who they attack or that they have any leg to stand on themselves, but I think I'm starting to understand the logic.
@sun
Sensitive media
Hidden by default.
[CW]
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Show
Hide
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
@sun
That's a fair point for sure.
@mangeurdenuage
[CW]
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Show
Hide
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
sometimes it is even "I know some bad uses will happen but it's worth it" and they are just wrong in their calculation (it happens) or they're not imaginative enough about what bad people will do with it. I admit I could be said to fall into the same category as this with AI shit. that is my steelmanning of their position, they're still wrong but could be understandable
[CW]
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Show
Hide
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Gigachad Truman.
[CW]
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Show
Hide
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
@sun @gabriel @mangeurdenuage
> who don't understand the difference between "what I'm building today" and "what will bad people in power inevitably do with what I built"
from what i see that's how the majority of the political left functions: they either ignore or just don't see at that their actions have consequences in 2nd, 3rd, ... degree as well.
[CW]
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
Show
Hide
Content warning
re: Navel gazing about how "woke 1 was crazy"
right wingers do that too, that is the basis of ignoring ecology concerns.
Other good examples:
- We care about family, but not enough to think about what environment healthy families need to flourish rather than languish.
- We care about "our people" because they're the best, but no none of them are in any way salvageable if they have discernable problems.
- We love free market economics but if your business is pushed out by VC bros running at a loss you just should have been gambling or something. Idk buy gold.
- we care about the truth, not feelings up until it kills the feel good vibe and then it's just "blackpilling"
@gabriel @sun @mangeurdenuage oh, they have their own set of idiocy indeed. mind that i'm looking from an eurotard perspective, it was literally hitler to say "maybe we need a plan and loads of resources to somewhat integrate the millions of syrians".
@sun @gabriel @mangeurdenuage new trend is that they are all homosexuals who need asylum for their sexual identity.
@sun @gabriel @mangeurdenuage yes, i also would suggest the west is too tolerant now.
@bonifartius @sun @gabriel @mangeurdenuage
they either ignore or just don't see at that their actions have consequences in 2nd, 3rd, ... degree as well
This is explicitly built into Keynesian economics. When questioned about critics of his theories pointing out people will simply change their behaviors in response to his policies he quipped: "In the long run we're all dead." Bonus points for being the earliest example I'm aware of of pretending not to understand in order to make discourse impossible.