Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Fetching context…

This post replies to something we haven't fetched yet. We'll try to pull in the missing thread context in the background.

Replies

50
Your religion is fictional yet you're still a pagan? What kind of retarded shit is that?

The "super jew" you're referring to has no bearing on the jews of today. Jesus is not based on the talmud, and a "super jew" like you're trying to apply would be far more appropriate to Thor, or superman, who was created by a jew. I understand that you're mad because your parents made you go to Sunday school when you were a kid but it's time to grow up.
@Oughtism @pernia @vitalis @wingedhussar @bronzeagebond

> Your religion is fictional yet you're still a pagan?

There's no point in trying to explain theology to someone who's retarded. So I won't bother.

> The "super jew" you're referring to has no bearing on the jews of today

Same Jew Torah. Same Jew God. You literally worship a Jew buddy, and your whole religion is based around a mythical super-Jew. That's a fact.

> ...Thor ... who was created by a jew.

Germanic myths have nothing to do with Jews.
@Oughtism @bronzeagebond @pernia @vitalis @wingedhussar

> Your entire religion...

You have no idea what my religion is. Paganism isn't a single religion. It's a big tent that includes many religions. In many cases scripture has little or nothing to do with it. You're gonna remain ignorant, and there's obviously nothing I can or will say to change that. Which was what generally prompted my first response in this thread to start with.

> You're carrying water for kikes.

Says the guy who worships a pseudohistorical super-Jew. LMAO
@wingedhussar @pernia @vitalis @Oughtism @bronzeagebond @subnetter

Moloch was the name of a ritual where Jews would incinerate children (ie. a holocaust) to Yahweh. They can pretend Yahweh said that was bad mkay, but it was not because of murdering children (which Abrahamites are still doing to this day in the name of their retard fairy tale), but because the ritual was modelled after the practices of neighbouring groups, and therefore not Jew enough.

@Oughtism @pernia @vitalis @wingedhussar @bronzeagebond @toiletpaper I have yet to meet a single self proclaimed Christian on here who wasn't an embarrassing bigot spreading blasphemy on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

In terms you may better understand, Matthew 7:3-5 :smug2:

3 Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

@slipgate @pernia @vitalis @bronzeagebond @Hoss

True. But name me one other major class of superstition besides the Abrahamic whose doctrine mandates that those who choose not to participate are fair game to murder with impunity. Some individuals might be "good" in that they cherry pick what to believe/do and let their conscience over-rule the dogma, but by continuing to identify with and promote the same doctrine, they perpetuate that behaviour and are thus equally culpable.
@slipgate @pernia @vitalis @bronzeagebond @Hoss

There are plenty of other ideologies which foster enmity towards out-groups, but as far as Abrahamic superstitions (they've hijacked the term "religion" while being nothing of the sort) are concerned, unlike any other world religion it's actually in scriptural doctrine, and they have a >2,000 year long track record of consistently acting upon it accordingly. Deflecting with a fallacy of relative privation doesn't change that.
@slipgate @pernia @vitalis @bronzeagebond @Hoss

> biased towards with the "not a real X [religion]" ... posts about history

Incidentally, I'm not the first to point this out.

* Pliny the Younger (c. 110 CE) described Christianity as a "perverse and extravagant superstition" (superstitio prava et immodica) in his correspondence with Emperor Trajan, noting its spread like a contagious disease.

* Tacitus (c. 115 CE) referred to Christianity as a "deadly superstition" (mortifera superstitio) and a "mischievous superstition" (noxia superstitio) in his Annals, blaming it for social disruption.

* Suetonius (c. 121 CE) called Christians a class of people given to a "new and mischievous superstition" (superstitione nova ac malefica) in his biography of Nero.

* Emperor Julian (c. 362–363 CE) in "Against the Galileans" composed during his stay in Antioch, described contemporary Christians like Ammianus Marcellinus as having an addiction to superstition (deisidaimonia) rather than true religion, and [Saint] Cyril of Alexandria as "lazy and superstitious" (argoi kai deisidaimones). He asserted that their "fictions" (plasmata) corrupted the intelligence and led believers away from reality.

Those are just off the top of my head. I don't think they were wrong in the slightest.