remember how before chat gippity came along it was common for people to say constraints make better products, usually with regard to old games or movies before CGI
Post
Remote status
Context
7but I have a new appreciation for the saying now. it's not about suffering, it's about putting in the work to develop skills, to learn the craft and the body of work relevant to what you want to do, and that journey turning you into someone who can make good art
with AI, almost nobody will put in the work anymore. they can jump straight to an outcome, but the outcome will be shit
it's climbing a mountain vs having a helicopter drop you off at the top
AI isn't stopping anyone from drawing and being poor while doing it.
As I see it your argument is.... its going to discourage people from pursuing a craft for the wrong reasons and that's bad.
Sorry, AI actually makes art more authentic, no only for the reason I stated above, but because it also brings creation closer to the self for those who don't paint or draw. They can basically commission a work and even refine it to their imagining. The classic artist is far more distant from the self.
All this AI hate is just fuckimg dumb. It's a bunch of NPCs regurgitating talking points without really thinking through the existential relationship between the self and it's ability to create. AI enhances that, and doesn't otherwise prohibit classic methods.
Replies
18If someone else wants to use AI to make a song, that's cool. Go for it. Maybe it will sound like shit, maybe it will be novel, maybe an accident will occur and one that gives us new ideas.
So, AI as a tool helps you work in mixing music after having 10+ΒΏ? years of experience and refinement in doing. You know what you are asking it to do, and have a level of confidence going into it.
Do you think a novice grabbing said same AI tool day 1 can reliably work up to the competence level you built up without any AI assistance?
Nonetheless, as to the novice, I think it could depend on the intelligence of that person. AI can be educational, much like having a teacher. "Hey gpt, what are some classic methods to create a house bass"?β (The novice would spend more time watching a youtube video to get the same answer or worse tracking down a live producer). So if used right, it can facilitate learning. If not, then not. But the same can be said of most tools. We don't say someone is slop if they use a Phillips screw instead of a nail or glue. The flathead users can get fucked though.
I think the question raised by D implicitly is what is the motivation to create. My point is that AI does eliminate a lot of motivation that I find improper, motivation often leads men down bad roads, like a longing for fame or recognition. Those things are fine if given, but seeking them is a separate issue. The real motivation should be just to make shit.
With this in mind, I think AI eliminates markets in art, but also brings creation / art closer to the self. I can't draw at all. My wife paints, draws etc, hours a day. She makes art for her. If I need a picture, I'll use AI. I leave her to her thing. It's her work, not mine.
AI amplifies the quality of the user is a good perspective for individual use cases. If I thought I could use AI without atrophying my thinking circuits it would be to learn about things easier. I've had a bad reader's block for awhile.
It gets muddied by corporations shoving AI into everything though, and trying to use it as a magic tool to replace workers or amplify productivity. A whole lot of mess and proper slop to be criticized from that application.
I'd wager Mainframe AI dies like a dotcom bubbles, and its just motivated individuals using self-hosted LLMs in the future.
I'm just not convinced motivation is a real problem. I think a lot people enjoy making art. It's not going away. For example, once everyone was able to afford what would have been a $20 million studio in the 1980s on their laptop for a few thousand dollars with simple gear and plugins, and the market was flooded with music, some of which is good, some not, people still made music despite saturation. And people will still learn to paint and draw or make music despite AI, because we're human. It's what we do.
And writers block is real. Unlike me, who uses AI to draft initial drafts of letters in my practice, I'm not sure how AI can be employed in a creative context re writing. Perhaps by not having it draft the underlying text, that would be dumb, but rather using it to explore themes, character development, and story line?
I've used it for something similar. I watch a lot of horror / horror adjacent movies. I have used to to explore themes. Like the movie "We are Wolves" and how the title and wolf behavior related to the film, including whether Fenix was really an emergent alpha who ran the pack despite appearing to be subdominate.
>The flathead users can get fucked though.
How dare you insult the best tool in the toolbox!
Woman moment. Why are you a leftist queer?
why the fuck WOULD anyone struggle through, e.g., an electrical engineering degree legitimately if they can just cheat to get the paycheck? what is your answer to the massive deskilling that's happening right now across a bunch of industries? are you just going to deny it exists?
my points are rooted in basic human nature and irrefutable as a result, but you're sitting here arguing against them because you like having a slop slave and don't want to admit perhaps it is harmful to use it
Take a midol, lady.
Typical faggot response. Crazy exes and the woman brained go for the low hanging fruit. Absolute bait. You just outed yourself as a queer.
I put in the hard work to create something, ai is right there along side me to help in real time
I hand that exact same hard work to an artist, 50% chance I never get anything back, another 50% of the remainder is ruined by incompetence