I pretend to support it just for solidarity with the south-- but honestly the whole "unsweet" tea always did annoy me. It should be "unsweetened"
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
1
@bajax IT SHOULD BE NORMAL . IT SHOULD BE NONSWEETENED IF ANYTHING . IT'S CALLED TEA .
Replies
31
@f0x as long as we don't assume unlabeled means sweet I'm fine with it. though I'd be fine with unlabeled being unsweetened.
also don't you take tea with sugar?
also don't you take tea with sugar?
@bajax I do. But I don't call tea "unsweetened" as if i've removed sweetness or "nonsweetened" as if sweetened is the default state of the thing produced
@f0x eh. for me un- is just a lexical negation, not an ontological one imo. I'm ok with it just indicating something which is not, as opposed to something which was made to be not.
@bajax you're 💢 going to drive me to drink mr kitty
@f0x some nice earl grey i hope-- good for the nerves
@Will2Power @bajax sorry but westerners will always be more kickass than so*therners 
who cares if you can befriend a scaly puppydog with 0 opening force, we wrangle bison out here
who cares if you can befriend a scaly puppydog with 0 opening force, we wrangle bison out here
Milk and 2 sugars is normal, everything else is an aberration 😤
That's one too many sugars, but yeah.