@Shadowman311 @Griffith @Paultron There is at least one type of nuclear reactor design that literally cannot melt down. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#Safety
There are probably already several other types of nuclear reactor that literally cannot melt down, and there will probably be many more since there are "designs that are theoretically possible but not being actively considered or researched at present". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor#By_generation
Essentially, the only nuclear reactors that can melt down are the ones that produce plutonium as a byproduct, and the only reason to create a nuclear reactor that produces plutonium is to use the plutonium to create nuclear weapons. If you live near a nuclear weapon factory that happens to also produce electricity that might be dangerous, but you can choose to live near a power plant that uses a nuclear reactor without also living near a nuclear weapon factory (at least if at least one of the "safe" type of nuclear power plant was built in the last few decades).
There are probably already several other types of nuclear reactor that literally cannot melt down, and there will probably be many more since there are "designs that are theoretically possible but not being actively considered or researched at present". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor#By_generation
Essentially, the only nuclear reactors that can melt down are the ones that produce plutonium as a byproduct, and the only reason to create a nuclear reactor that produces plutonium is to use the plutonium to create nuclear weapons. If you live near a nuclear weapon factory that happens to also produce electricity that might be dangerous, but you can choose to live near a power plant that uses a nuclear reactor without also living near a nuclear weapon factory (at least if at least one of the "safe" type of nuclear power plant was built in the last few decades).