Starmer... stop giving me your toughest battles... (defending you on the internet)
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
6
What does piss me off though is all the goyim who think this is a Labour problem, or even specifically a Keir Starmer problem.
Conservatives and Lib Dems would support this. This isn't an ideological thing, it's institutional rot. This is happening all around the world, it's the unelected parts of the government growing greedier and greedier, demanding more surveillance powers.
Conservatives and Lib Dems would support this. This isn't an ideological thing, it's institutional rot. This is happening all around the world, it's the unelected parts of the government growing greedier and greedier, demanding more surveillance powers.
@yomiel Conservatives would go for this under the exact same justification (protect da kids).
@Griffith
I think it's odd the cognitive dissonance in the average normalfags mind that they simultaneously think that in certain circumstances, the head of state is receiving orders to do things, and other times it is their own doing/agenda. Even that dichotomy in and of itself is kind of retarded.
This online ID thing is an obvious example. Opinions among British rightoid goyim masses are split between this is being Klaus Schwab WEF directive or that it being communist Keir Stalin's next step of tyranny. Both ignore the more obvious possibility of this merely being a symptom of an unregulated and unaudited surveillance state operating within almost every nation, democratic or not.
This kind of thinking is not just low IQ, it also prevents real systemic change.
I think it's odd the cognitive dissonance in the average normalfags mind that they simultaneously think that in certain circumstances, the head of state is receiving orders to do things, and other times it is their own doing/agenda. Even that dichotomy in and of itself is kind of retarded.
This online ID thing is an obvious example. Opinions among British rightoid goyim masses are split between this is being Klaus Schwab WEF directive or that it being communist Keir Stalin's next step of tyranny. Both ignore the more obvious possibility of this merely being a symptom of an unregulated and unaudited surveillance state operating within almost every nation, democratic or not.
This kind of thinking is not just low IQ, it also prevents real systemic change.
You can be a perfectly decent person and still process the punchcards that help the trains take your victims to the camps. "The deepstate" is a bad thing because it's not publically accountable, and the complexity allows for atrocities to be covered up, and prevents people from stopping them. Even if everyone in it is a saint with no desire to murder or enslave anyone, the only justifiable action they can take is dismantling it, and going home to their family and friends.
@cy you need people who know how to do things. you need to figure out all kinds of procedures over time an build institutions. you won't get that, if you fire everybody and hire new people after every election. i'm not saying that i like this.
Replies
3
Bureaucracy is the death knell for empires. Once you have too much complexity, too many layers, too many people creating positions just to give themselves worth, it's impossible to keep things stable. Then the vultures like Reagan descend, and don't play by the rules until everyone's working to make things worse for themselves.
(This belies the fact that the USA law was intended from day 1 to consolidate power for the rich, was never good etc.)
But yeah I'm not saying firing the people working for 50 years on the EPA is going to do any good. Just that we have too much bureaucracy. We make everyone agree on the same private property laws, and debts for all time, and everything adds up on paper, but in practice it's ruining us all.
(This belies the fact that the USA law was intended from day 1 to consolidate power for the rich, was never good etc.)
But yeah I'm not saying firing the people working for 50 years on the EPA is going to do any good. Just that we have too much bureaucracy. We make everyone agree on the same private property laws, and debts for all time, and everything adds up on paper, but in practice it's ruining us all.