Earlier I saw him tweet against rapefugees and had to double check that was his actual account.
Better late than never, I guess. But is it too late?
Better late than never, I guess. But is it too late?
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
1WAIT, HE ACTUALLY DID SEE THE 4CHAN POST 
Replies
13
@Rasterman jesus is only portrayed one time in the movie and it is respectfully, the rest of the movie generally mocks religion which is basically okay
@sun@shitposter.world @Rasterman@detroitriotcity.com having just watched it the other day- jesus cured one of palin's characters and ruined his livelihood as a beggar. Whether that's mocking is borderline.
The other mention of Jesus was a background scene of the nativity more or less.
The other mention of Jesus was a background scene of the nativity more or less.
@sun
They mocked religion when most of the west was still at least nominally Christian. They knew exactly what they were doing and they REFUSE to do it to islam or judaism.
@Rasterman
They mocked religion when most of the west was still at least nominally Christian. They knew exactly what they were doing and they REFUSE to do it to islam or judaism.
@Rasterman
@pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman Precisely; on its own merits, Monty Python isn’t bad. What makes it bad is the constant culture-distortion that it was keyed into. The whole world had stopped taking the English Nation seriously - like a big joke. It’s the exact same thing that brought down the Soviet Union.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman Arguably things got bad, when they actually implemented Monty Python routines in the manuals of public officials.
I suppose 2 retarded cops with rainbow flags on their uniforms arresting you for a facebook post is eerily similar to the 2 officials coming to take your liver.
These were meant to be satire.
I suppose 2 retarded cops with rainbow flags on their uniforms arresting you for a facebook post is eerily similar to the 2 officials coming to take your liver.
These were meant to be satire.
@quercus @pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman Many such cases
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman >The whole world had stopped taking the English Nation seriously - like a big joke
Yes. And that fault does not belong to the comedians of their day but to the succession of homegrown weak political leaders of the 20th century that shaped the world those comedians grew up in (and the judeo american imperialists that supplanted and castrated the homegrown ones).
Yes. And that fault does not belong to the comedians of their day but to the succession of homegrown weak political leaders of the 20th century that shaped the world those comedians grew up in (and the judeo american imperialists that supplanted and castrated the homegrown ones).
If the momentum had shifted, and Britain had swung hard to the right, bloodily eradicating its satanic subversives, and restoring a strong muscular Christian patriarchy, cleese and every other comedian would have screamed like banshees.
They are not neutral commentators. He was and still is 100% onboard with removing Christian rule. He is just mad that the satanic White rule that he worked for degenerated into satanic nigger rule before he died.
They are not neutral commentators. He was and still is 100% onboard with removing Christian rule. He is just mad that the satanic White rule that he worked for degenerated into satanic nigger rule before he died.
@weknowwhygary @Rasterman @KingOfWhiteAmerica @pepsi_man @sun I think that's your preconceptions rather than his words that you're going off.
@pepsi_man @Rasterman @sun
See, I don't care about jokes. I consider myself a Christian, so it's unfair that nobody does a "life of Muhammad" where a guy is mistaken for a prophet and pokes fun at Islam. Judaism gets more jokes than Islam.
If you want me to take your religion seriously, don't bomb cartoonists.
See, I don't care about jokes. I consider myself a Christian, so it's unfair that nobody does a "life of Muhammad" where a guy is mistaken for a prophet and pokes fun at Islam. Judaism gets more jokes than Islam.
If you want me to take your religion seriously, don't bomb cartoonists.
@pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman Arguably things got worse, when people stopped mocking religion.
Today's elites treat Christianity with hate, Judaism and Islam with fear, all other religions with the fake "respect" we have for the "beautiful painting" of a 3-year-old.
No one actually benevolently mocks religion anymore.
Today's elites treat Christianity with hate, Judaism and Islam with fear, all other religions with the fake "respect" we have for the "beautiful painting" of a 3-year-old.
No one actually benevolently mocks religion anymore.
@quercus @pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman Countless Jewish comedians, actors, and screen writers have spent entire careers mocking Jews, Jewish culture, and the Jewish religion. But then again, revolution, subversion, mocking, and transgressivism is a key component of Jewish culture and how they interact with other cultures.
To me, when people make the argument that Python helped to undermine the thing Cleese now misses so badly, what they're referencing (without realizing it) is the way their comedy did the same thing we recognize as dangerous in Jewish entertainment. Were the skits and jokes funny? Yes. Did they often have a point in terms of cultural critique? Yes. Did Cleese and the rest of them make their stuff with malicious intent? No.
But looking back at it, looking at things as they are now, and on a gut level we recognize the subversion and transgressive poison that ate away at the culture's foundation. Seinfeld could be funny, in the moment you first saw it. Yet after a while, when you've had time to digest it, you come to deeply dislike the characters. They're awful, petty, stupid, supremely selfish people. Their actions don't just make their own lives worse, their stupidity and selfishness seeps out to harm everything else around them. It was a Jewish comedy being funny as Jewish comedy often is: mocking, denigrating, subversive, transgressive. In a word, corrosive.
Python was funny, is often still funny. But it too was corrosive in its own way. You can't mock a thing and not harm it, you can't mock a people and not degrade them. Instead of using their talents to help build up Anglo culture, they threw acid on its support beams. It wasn't intentional, it wasn't malicious, but it's what happened.
To me, when people make the argument that Python helped to undermine the thing Cleese now misses so badly, what they're referencing (without realizing it) is the way their comedy did the same thing we recognize as dangerous in Jewish entertainment. Were the skits and jokes funny? Yes. Did they often have a point in terms of cultural critique? Yes. Did Cleese and the rest of them make their stuff with malicious intent? No.
But looking back at it, looking at things as they are now, and on a gut level we recognize the subversion and transgressive poison that ate away at the culture's foundation. Seinfeld could be funny, in the moment you first saw it. Yet after a while, when you've had time to digest it, you come to deeply dislike the characters. They're awful, petty, stupid, supremely selfish people. Their actions don't just make their own lives worse, their stupidity and selfishness seeps out to harm everything else around them. It was a Jewish comedy being funny as Jewish comedy often is: mocking, denigrating, subversive, transgressive. In a word, corrosive.
Python was funny, is often still funny. But it too was corrosive in its own way. You can't mock a thing and not harm it, you can't mock a people and not degrade them. Instead of using their talents to help build up Anglo culture, they threw acid on its support beams. It wasn't intentional, it wasn't malicious, but it's what happened.
@Charles_in_Charge @pepsi_man @sun @Rasterman I don't disagree with you on that, but I believe the mocking was merely a symptom of the decline of the west, not it's cause. Just like the 1960s counterculture.
Today's conservatives (and also the "tradwife" movement as an example) often glorify the American 1950s, which were in fact an era of soulless consumerism - the 1960s probably were a mere reaction to this.
The seeds were sown much earlier and it no coincidence that Nietzsche claimed that "god was dead" in his day and age. He wouldn't have done it in the middle ages.
The roots of the rot probably lie in the industrial revolution which up-ended people's lives like no event since the neolithic revolution 10,000 years before.
Today's conservatives (and also the "tradwife" movement as an example) often glorify the American 1950s, which were in fact an era of soulless consumerism - the 1960s probably were a mere reaction to this.
The seeds were sown much earlier and it no coincidence that Nietzsche claimed that "god was dead" in his day and age. He wouldn't have done it in the middle ages.
The roots of the rot probably lie in the industrial revolution which up-ended people's lives like no event since the neolithic revolution 10,000 years before.