Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

1
i have a question. anyone is welcome to answer, though i'd especially appreciate POVs from immigrants with a visibly different ethnicity from the majority of their country of residence.

i moved from germany to france. no one here can tell i'm from germany until i open my mouth and speak somewhat broken french. should i call myself an immigrant on this platform? i feel like that term implies things about me that aren't necessarily true, but at the same time i do not want to call myself an "expat" because i don't want to put myself above anyone else who came to this country.

i am asking for opinions here, not dictionary definitions.

Replies

15
@flisk oh I see. yeah I don't think that's a good idea. I don't mean to minimize your concern because definitely some people will read into "immigrant" if you just put that in your profile and hold it against you if they find out you're (I assume) white and relatively affluent/unoppressed. I don't think they should, but they will.
@sun that's exactly the train of thought that led me to this question. i'll say this: i haven't encountered anyone who made that assumption and then treated me like someone who was "stealing valor". i'll probably cross that bridge when i get to it, if ever.
@sun @flisk

> definitely some people will read into "immigrant" if you just put that in your
> profile and hold it against you if they find out you're (I assume) white and
> relatively affluent/unoppressed. I don't think they should, but they will.

This. Very briefly: At this point, don't even try to play the game, don't try to adopt the vocabulary, don't attempt to traverse the intersectionality maze. It's hegemonic discourse.

For bio purposes, "Born and raised in Germany, now living in France" or something similar will steer clear of any of those issue. You can throw in as much or as little additional detail in there as you like, too (like, for example, "podunk Germany" and "suburban France", or whatever reflects your situation).
@pingviini @sun i specifically chose "immigrant" because it's somewhat unexpected, and most affluent white people wouldn't choose to call themselves that, despite the term being accurate in the literal reading. it's also somewhat in tension with acknowledging the struggle of people who had it harder than me, but that's what this whole question is about.

i don't know what that bit about hegemonic discourse is supposed to mean. i don't really care about that.
@flisk @sun

>> i don't know what that bit about hegemonic discourse is supposed to mean.
> i specifically chose "immigrant" because [...]

It all depends on what you're going to post about and who is going to read it of course, but, again very briefly: You're trying to make some sort of statement by intentionally choosing an ambiguous, somewhat loaded trigger word and you're bound to find out in an unpleasant way that there are cliques of people who have assumed (or are trying to assume) discursive power of that sort of vocabulary and these people are not pleasant to interact with and not beneath bullying tactics.

You might or might not encounter them, but you're definitely running the risk, if you step onto their turf.