@shibao @icedquinn @silverpill @sun >how do you say "i refuse to read a dockerfile and then try to translate the package commands or whatever into the OS that I'm wanting to use"
I didn't say that.
>and then also talk about the maintenance burden of maintaining these OS guides
It's called a trade-off for user experience. One may not want to install Docker, one may want to use prebuilt OTP bundles (even thought they are a clusterfuck thanks to glibc), or simply install from source because they want to HACK ON SOFTWARE THEY USE. It's called options.
>(not even going into all the issues where you need to debug every user's custom OS and setup quirks.
I've been doing 1-800-PLEROMA support for over 2 years. Never had I need to do that outside of maybe asking 2 questions and giving an answer within 10 minutes. This is a mostly non-existent issue if you deliberately only support sane-ish OSes. It's the reason why I dropped the Arch source install guide, because I don't want to debug a rolling release where something can change any day. If you want to run Arch, there's been a barely known Docker image for that for years. I might even write an install guide on how to use that image some day. It's also the reason why I didn't bother writing a Fedora/RHEL source install guide despite literally running that OS, supporting it properly means updating my SELinux policies and I don't want to do that every 6 months.