https://x.com/thefatum0/status/2047021848278212836
https://gelbooru.com/index.php?id=13921898&page=post&s=view
https://gelbooru.com/index.php?id=13921898&page=post&s=view
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
13
@mer @hj @moth_ball @k1tteh def chubby, too high fat % relative to muscle content to be considered good health range, but not enough that i would tax you if i could tax fat people. You'd be right at the threshold below.
If i called you fattie i wouldn't feel i was wrong to do so
You could do with losing like 5-8kg fat, then I'd call you lean/good healthy weight ratio.
If i called you fattie i wouldn't feel i was wrong to do so
You could do with losing like 5-8kg fat, then I'd call you lean/good healthy weight ratio.
@lebronjames75 @hj @moth_ball @k1tteh losing 8kg would put me back under 60 which is kinda insane so I politely disagree
I'm actually pretty happy to have put on a little chub, it's been hard to forcefeed myself to that point
however, I do agree I always shoule put on more muscle, my back has downgradred and my legs can always be bigger
I have the inevitable belly fat layer but it's that or having hip dips and a concave ass, even with squats
notably still almost zero fat on the thighs or arms, it's all in ass and belly (I cannot do a subQ injection in the thigh without hitting muscle)
I'm actually pretty happy to have put on a little chub, it's been hard to forcefeed myself to that point
however, I do agree I always shoule put on more muscle, my back has downgradred and my legs can always be bigger
I have the inevitable belly fat layer but it's that or having hip dips and a concave ass, even with squats
notably still almost zero fat on the thighs or arms, it's all in ass and belly (I cannot do a subQ injection in the thigh without hitting muscle)
@lebronjames75 @hj @moth_ball @k1tteh if I was both 60kg AND more muscle% I would be like >~4% body fat, model levels where you start worrying about water retention
@mer @hj @moth_ball @k1tteh nah stop over thinking it
you'll know when it's healthiest reasonably achievable, don't get bogged down by muh numbers, they are there for guides, it's why i give them in ranges, because the right answer isn't "EXACTLY THIS"
you'll know when it's healthiest reasonably achievable, don't get bogged down by muh numbers, they are there for guides, it's why i give them in ranges, because the right answer isn't "EXACTLY THIS"
@moth_ball @hj @k1tteh @mer ill schedule a beatdown sometime later this summer, if i can find a moment of time in the busy schedule
