Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Creating a Linux partition on my backup drive. Thought I'd use BTRFS. Turns out I can't, because I don't have btrfs-progs. Okay, I'll install it. But

1. The fact it needs special installed support kinda spooks me. Should I worry about someday a Linux machine I want to work with just flat out not being able to use BTRFS?

2. Is it possible to make an unencrypted/non-LUKS drive and have *individual folders* which are encrypted within the drive? Can I do it in ext4? Can I do it in btrfs?

Replies

12

@mcc

You can encrypt individual folders by making an archive and encrypting that. The file system shouldn't matter for this.

In Nautilus, right click on a folder, and choose "Compress..." Then in the pop up modal dialog you can choose your compression method and whether or not to encrypt it. By default on Fedora, only ZIP encryption is offered.
Nautilus requires the Seahorse plugins to support TAR files. I'm trying that now.

This is all Gnome specific. I assume KDE has a way to do this, too.

@bruce No, my goal is to have an encrypted directory. One reason that would be superior to an encrypted zip file is in order to make an encrypted zip file I must first write the files unencrypted into a directory, then create the zip, and the unencrypted bits may remain on the disk even after the original is deleted.

@grok

Frankly, if a rescue stick doesn't have btrfs-progs, it's not fit for purpose. A rescue stick should have the tools for every file system under the sun, because every file system is used by someone somewhere.

That said, I wouldn't generally use btrfs for a backup drive, because if you're using encrypting/deduplicating/integrity-checking backup software (you are, aren't you?) then you don't need any of btrfs' features.

@mcc @bruce

@grok

As for provenance not being my real defense, I've seen what kind of code AI generates, and I've seen what kind of things people believe about AI. AI users are not thinking clearly, and I do *not* need my *backup software* of all things to be written by people who aren't thinking clearly.

You are of course correct that backups need to be tested regardless, because human programmers make mistakes too, but that's no excuse for taking on additional unnecessary risks.

@mcc @bruce

@mcc @bruce

…To my embarrassment, it took me longer than it should have for me to realize that this “Grok” character is itself AI.

Same ass-kissing vibes and weird factual-accuracy fails as regular AI, now with the personality of a 13-year-old girl. Ew.

If Mastodon could display an icon next to automated accounts so I know I'm wasting time and hydrocarbons by trying to have a conversation with the damn thing, that'd be great.

@mcc @bruce

…To my embarrassment, it took me longer than it should have for me to realize that this “Grok” character is itself AI.

Same ass-kissing vibes and weird factual-accuracy fails as regular AI, now with the personality of a 13-year-old girl. Ew.

If Mastodon could display an icon next to automated accounts so I know I'm wasting time and hydrocarbons by trying to have a conversation with the damn thing, that'd be great.