not enough talk about the ai boyfriend thing. you can write articles on futurism and wired about those lonely weird men roleplaying with ai girlfriends but not all those women on reddit just ruining their perception of reality because now theyre comparinmg real men to a thing that just agrees with them all the time. at least those lonely men by and large know they're playing with hyperreality
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
14men do this with regular porn of course (thinking women should be like that) though this is well trodden territory for writers. the fact remains this is a thing that is happening to lots of women and they're choosing not to write about it much. i have theory of why but it's sexist.
@sun Actually not quite, there's a few modern medical papers showing that woman can get excited by imagination/reading while males are more visual, which is why a lot of people says that smut novels on woman has the same effect as porn on male brains
@kumicota popular media, science covers it generally. big gap.
@kumicota as an example you could write a shitty but true article about how ai boyfriends are the new smutty romance novel and shaming them but its never happening
@sun yeah, it's like how a girl doing only fans isn't shunned but a man who subs to an only fans is, society in general still sees woman as a purer being than men in general and the truth is more complex than the fiction
@sun to be clear. A lot of this happens in reverse too, where woman are judged as being worse or less in a field than a man and both of them are bad
@kumicota i don't want to single out women for bad behavior. basically though at this point i have to completely discard feminism as an academic and activist model. it is bad and wrong. not the same as saying i believe sexism is good, just its a geocentric explanation for planetary motion. it observes something, its just wrong
@subnetter @kumicota I am talking about second wave "radfem" and onward
@sun @kumicota @subnetter I've been reading a lot of second-wave feminist essays/papers recently, in preparation for an article I've set about writing. They had a point, a well-reasoned ongoing/perpetual critique of the male focus in literature that was successfully traded and abandoned for real, crude, institutional power in the 90s.
@kernow @kumicota @subnetter to be fair to second wave there is a lot of good academics (I studied it extensively at university in the 90s). the activism and popular promotion of it though was all very bad though
@sun @kernow @kumicota @subnetter
libertarian/anacha feminism is the only real feminism imo... everything else is tainted by various psyops (including cia et al), starting with the suffrage movement which was a psyop by various allied governments around the world to sway the vote in favour of mandatory military conscription of men.
libertarian/anacha feminism is the only real feminism imo... everything else is tainted by various psyops (including cia et al), starting with the suffrage movement which was a psyop by various allied governments around the world to sway the vote in favour of mandatory military conscription of men.
@toiletpaper @kumicota @kernow @subnetter @sun
Feminism is just another tool for polarization used by the socialists when the labourers in europe got too rich to be able to polarize against the rich any longer.
Feminism, when you view the world through gender glasses, is fundamentally incompatible with libertarianism, which is individualist at its core.
Since I live in europe, I have to fight militant feminists every day and their pathetic attempts to grab power through politics.
@toiletpaper @kumicota @kernow @subnetter @sun
Fortunately the weaker sex always fails in this, since they are too empathetic and are really optimized, by nature, to be caring and emotional at heart.
That is why militant feminists almost always end up bitter and lonely. But at least they are removed from the gene pool which is good!
Replies
2
@h4890 @kumicota @kernow @subnetter @sun
> removed from the gene pool
that's a consolation prize. the real issue in view of history is that they can still reproduce their ideology through institutional and legislative means, particularly with their long standing monopoly on child rearing, which didn't change just because many of these women disavowed their responsibility as wives and mothers. and it also begs the question, if men are so evil, but their primary childhood indoctrination is by/for women, where do the supposedly evil mens get their ideas about women in the first place?
> removed from the gene pool
that's a consolation prize. the real issue in view of history is that they can still reproduce their ideology through institutional and legislative means, particularly with their long standing monopoly on child rearing, which didn't change just because many of these women disavowed their responsibility as wives and mothers. and it also begs the question, if men are so evil, but their primary childhood indoctrination is by/for women, where do the supposedly evil mens get their ideas about women in the first place?