Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

4

LA Times: O.C. immigration attorneys suspended for filing briefs filled with AI-hallucinated errors

"...The ruling was clear that the discipline wasn’t issued simply for the use of AI, but “due to their filing of briefs containing multiple nonexistent cases, misattributed quotations, and gross misrepresentations of real cases, and due to their lack of candor in revealing that these fabrications and inaccuracies were the result of hallucinations by generative AI.”...

(paywall)
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-06-04/suspended-o-c-immigration-attorneys-filed-briefs-filled-with-ai-slop

#legal #law #aislop #AIpocalypse

@Dougfir @ai6yr

> Why would an attorney even want to use AI?

According to the recent Stanford study, it's better than the average lawyer when you use models with strong reasoning capabilities (Gemini and NotebookLM).

> Perhaps most striking: professors flagged AI responses as pedagogically harmful only 3.5% of the time, compared to 12% for peer-written answers.

https://law.stanford.edu/press/ai-outperforms-law-professors-in-stanford-law-study/

Replies

0

Fetching replies…