Egregoros · Phoenix Framework

Post

Remote status

Context

Kazak

These discussions annoy me because there's an inherent dishonesty to them. It's illegal to advocate for organized political violence, which shapes how these arguments play out in online spheres.

It's kind of like how libtards have to make roundabout arguments about good schools because it's illegal for them to say nigger

RT: https://poa.st/objects/9e235713-f898-4719-81f6-4e19b016113b

Ghislaine 🌕

@Ghislaine@poa.st remote

The thing is that it doesn't seem like there is any organization occuring at all. Obviously I get that you can't just say I'm going kill person x or I'm organizing a rw terror group or whatever on public social media - but all kinds of people say "there is no political solution" as a thought terminating cliche to indicate that they are fully checked out and doing nothing, with no impetus to go beyond that. Which is stupid. You might as well try politics if you're gonna not do anything else.

And if you really think there's no political solution you should probably act like you think there is one anyway to keep the heat off your schemes. So really saying "there is no political solution" is completely worthless from every angle except maybe as a completely theoretical statement.

Replying to @Ghislaine@poa.st

Kazak

@Kazak@shin.mugicha.club remote

My point is that you're not getting an accurate view of the political landscape by what you see online since the incentive structure heavily disincentivizes frank discourse of that nature.

And I don't begrudge people "doing nothing" because "doing useful things" is difficult. There's an incredibly high barrier to entry when it comes to forming a guerrilla force with the strength to topple the American government

But that doesn't mean it's not the right solution

Replies

No replies yet.