@SK1ZM @DEERBLOOD @WTFPurpleAlpaca @jeffcliff when you try to hide in the ladies toilet
Posts
Latest notes
No posts yet.
@Wormwood We had a similar situation with Castlevania: SOTN
@PraxisOfEvil you're addicted to drama dude.
@sun 13% of females are committing more than 51% of all orgasms.
what is the context of this? my daughter insist this is James with boobs. I thought the joke was it was some other chick and they were dogging on Misty. how did this happen?
thanks. I hate it.
original version turned out to be chill though, if a little plain.
Can you recommend a remix that isn't total noise salad?
I guess Glitch Mob Drink the Sea is close enough.
original version turned out to be chill though, if a little plain.
Can you recommend a remix that isn't total noise salad?
I guess Glitch Mob Drink the Sea is close enough.
Just some low effort dj bullshit
real effort hasn't been tried.
Trust me. I'm on the weird shit.
I just roll like this instead of listening to tweenager adult swim burger king commercial techno:
https://poa.st/objects/d67fe74f-c931-4913-a37e-09473bd...
https://on.soundcloud.com/c8dNDAjfv7CGEqAKrX
I just roll like this instead of listening to tweenager adult swim burger king commercial techno:
https://poa.st/objects/d67fe74f-c931-4913-a37e-09473bd...
https://on.soundcloud.com/c8dNDAjfv7CGEqAKrX
grok hallucinated constantly and couldn't give me an accurate link to a legal citation, but chatgpt has been extremely helpful to me in self representation.
the issue is it wants to constantly moralize and pussy out, trying to tell me it knows how the judge thinks, or strategies to use procedure rather than litigate the point I'm making. Then there is also the ask your physician/ lawyer warnings.
None of that stuff is helpful, but the actual legal citations work perfectly, if I kick it in the balls hard enough.
I have to be like don't tell me how to play it, give me the information I want and actually review the documents and give me links to them. every link and analysis checks out.
Grok could only get 1 out of 10 citations correct, no matter how I argued with it.
the issue is it wants to constantly moralize and pussy out, trying to tell me it knows how the judge thinks, or strategies to use procedure rather than litigate the point I'm making. Then there is also the ask your physician/ lawyer warnings.
None of that stuff is helpful, but the actual legal citations work perfectly, if I kick it in the balls hard enough.
I have to be like don't tell me how to play it, give me the information I want and actually review the documents and give me links to them. every link and analysis checks out.
Grok could only get 1 out of 10 citations correct, no matter how I argued with it.