Goal๐ฏ๐ป๐ฎ๐ช๐ด๐ฎ๐ป 
They are literally just making soulkiller. Cyberpunk was not supposed to be a fucking documentary. This post is sensationalist obviously but it's clear what they are working towards.
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
10
@Goalkeeper This warrants the Sodom & Gomorrah treatment in my opinion.
@Goalkeeper >"So what happens when we have a working copy of the human mind?"
Brother we already know, they're called Nyto's.
Brother we already know, they're called Nyto's.
@Goalkeeper I guarantee they didn't do what they claimed, that's not how physics works, but as you say, the fact they even want to is worrisome.
@Goalkeeper@nicecrew.digital how beautiful, man-made horrors that i can comprehend
Yup they want two things: A. Immortality for themselves and/or B. To trap us in a permanent digital hellscape so we are their slaves forever with no escape.
@Goalkeeper they did an experiment and got the wrong lesson, the correct lesson is that flies have no soul
@Goalkeeper 6 oom is huge possibly insurmountable without ten trillion dollars (guessing)
@Goalkeeper That's actually pretty cool, too bad we throw most of our grants at "critical theory".
@sun @Goalkeeper
can't find any source for this on cursory search (no original post on claimed source account "eon systems"; "eon systems" website gives no information on anything (at all) either; lists a few famous science guys as advisors, but quick web search also yields no overlap of e.g. "george church" or "stephen wolfram" + "eon systems"; and the "team" page seems to list a few people who appear only in places like "cryopreservation wiki". also most recent result i'd heard of at least was https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07763-9 , much more vague (admittedly haven't been paying so much attention this past year or so as once was me
also more than 6 orders at the computational level; ~7? dealing with synapses rather than just neurons. and liable to find more complications in actually mapping from cellular differentiation etc
with a big limiting factor still being computational architecture to efficiently run a connectome though, and changing that being the biggest limit to otherwise seemingly more easy to achieve "agi", probably pointless to discussion
can't find any source for this on cursory search (no original post on claimed source account "eon systems"; "eon systems" website gives no information on anything (at all) either; lists a few famous science guys as advisors, but quick web search also yields no overlap of e.g. "george church" or "stephen wolfram" + "eon systems"; and the "team" page seems to list a few people who appear only in places like "cryopreservation wiki". also most recent result i'd heard of at least was https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07763-9 , much more vague (admittedly haven't been paying so much attention this past year or so as once was me
also more than 6 orders at the computational level; ~7? dealing with synapses rather than just neurons. and liable to find more complications in actually mapping from cellular differentiation etc
with a big limiting factor still being computational architecture to efficiently run a connectome though, and changing that being the biggest limit to otherwise seemingly more easy to achieve "agi", probably pointless to discussion
