why is it Judeo-Christian? are Muslims too far separated from the other two to be lumped in together?
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
5
@cell it was made up to convince christians to be zionists but anglo legal history does consider jewish law but not islamic.
@sun @cell The actual answer is that only Judaism and Christianity are eschatologically progressive, whether that's the conversion/subjugation of the world or lefto-Progressivism or every nation in the world becoming a liberal democracy.
Islam doesn't have that. It has the notion that it's the prerogative of Muslims to conquer and kill the pagans wherever they're found, but there's not necessarily an elevated quality of being except following the Hadiths. The old Arab clan structures and customs were all kept mostly as is and were expected to be kept forever.
Mystical Islam tends to borrow the Indian notion of regressive time cycles that periodically reset.
Islam doesn't have that. It has the notion that it's the prerogative of Muslims to conquer and kill the pagans wherever they're found, but there's not necessarily an elevated quality of being except following the Hadiths. The old Arab clan structures and customs were all kept mostly as is and were expected to be kept forever.
Mystical Islam tends to borrow the Indian notion of regressive time cycles that periodically reset.
Replies
1