2026 in a nut
shell
shell
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
5
Ukraine celebrating baby killing mothers and now sending women to the front.
A woman can make babies, men can't. This is not a winning strategy, unless the goal is to genocide all of Ukraine and replace the population with pajeets and niggers.
@EvolLove @JoeBravo77 the point is genocide but they want it to become a second Israel since ashkernazis originally come from there and are a sort of inbred slav
BealtaineGoat They're a mix of jew, turkic and a bit of slav thrown in. The original Khazars were mongols, although they became mystery meat by the time they became jewish.
@Eiregoat @geistigbehindert @EvolLove @JoeBravo77
The whole Khazar thing originated from this VN post in 2015. That's it's entire `factual` basis. Khazars did adopt Judajism, but it was mostly just the aristocracy who did it for political reasons.
http://web.archive.org/web/20150318030303/http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/08/the-hidden-history-of-the-incredibly-evil-khazarian-mafia/
The whole Khazar thing originated from this VN post in 2015. That's it's entire `factual` basis. Khazars did adopt Judajism, but it was mostly just the aristocracy who did it for political reasons.
http://web.archive.org/web/20150318030303/http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/08/the-hidden-history-of-the-incredibly-evil-khazarian-mafia/
No, there's plenty of contemporary sources about the Khazars and their adoption of judaism. I even remember a jew telling me about it around ~2000. It's certainly not something that someone invented in 2015.
Replies
2
@Eiregoat @geistigbehindert @EvolLove @JoeBravo77
I know the aristocracy adopted Judajism, but I think the whole debate about the Ashkenazim is another story. It doesn't seem to be supported by much evidence beyond a handful of activists and fringe talk show hosts who try to push that idea as a way of discrediting Ashkenaz identity.
Maybe it's true. Maybe it's not. But in my experience the types of people who insist on that are often the same people who believe in flat earth and probono proctologists from another star system creating the human race through genetic manipulation. It's a retarded sideshow that has little to no value beyond making criticism of Judajism look ridiculous.
I know the aristocracy adopted Judajism, but I think the whole debate about the Ashkenazim is another story. It doesn't seem to be supported by much evidence beyond a handful of activists and fringe talk show hosts who try to push that idea as a way of discrediting Ashkenaz identity.
Maybe it's true. Maybe it's not. But in my experience the types of people who insist on that are often the same people who believe in flat earth and probono proctologists from another star system creating the human race through genetic manipulation. It's a retarded sideshow that has little to no value beyond making criticism of Judajism look ridiculous.
Ultimately I don't really care: jews are jews and they've always been like this.
But the historical evidence does suggest the azkhenazim are khazars.
As for "the aristocracy adopted it." That's always how it starts. Same way most European countries "christianisation" was actually just a king and a few nobles kissing the ring for a trade deal.
But the historical evidence does suggest the azkhenazim are khazars.
As for "the aristocracy adopted it." That's always how it starts. Same way most European countries "christianisation" was actually just a king and a few nobles kissing the ring for a trade deal.