Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

3

I personally don't think LLMs or GenAI software in general is always unethical by definition.

Currently almost all available implementations of it are unethical, but I see this as only temporary. There are definitely ways to create these AI models in an ethical way. We just haven't done that yet.

We also haven't fully figured out all the requirements to even make them respect the user's freedom in the first place.

I'm getting kind of frustrated because mainstream opinions are either "GenAI bad, you must never use it ever at all" or "GenAI best thing ever ever happened to computing, we will reach AGI soon".

Not many people looking at the current tech hype in a more objective way.

Replies

9
@SuperDicq @sun @mischievoustomato
>Did you feel kneecapped back then?
You have no idea how hard it is to learn something about a programming language, programming in general or a library. Search engines are utterly useless, documentation sucks in most cases and Stackoverflow has been dead for years. Having a tool that is a glorified search engine that understands context is really useful in that scenario where documentation does not exist, is lacking or straight up wrong. It is is what search engines used to be.

@phnt@fluffytail.org @sun@shitposter.world @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love I know it is a lot of work to learn about programming. I am a programmer myself after all. I also know what it is like having lacking documentation and reading the source code to understand it instead. But I personally find that makes it even more rewarding when you do find a solution.

That's probably another (but personal) issue that I have with LLM usage. It removes the hacker spirit that I love. It turns everyone into result oriented goblins who do not appreciate the art of hacking. They just want something done as fast as possible, without caring about the journey.